<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bay Area Composer and Teacher Michael Kaulkin &#187; Joseph Schwantner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/tag/joseph-schwantner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com</link>
	<description>Composer and Teacher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:14:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Something For Everyone in &#8220;Sparrows&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/something-for-everyone-in-sparrows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/something-for-everyone-in-sparrows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kaulkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Schwantner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timbre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/archives/145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month aworks wrote something that has fascinated me ever since: I just have no interest in harmony. I can&#8217;t hear it, I don&#8217;t enjoy it when I recognize it, it&#8217;s boring to read about, etc. Timbre on the other hand&#8230; It had never occurred to me that one can enjoy music without enjoying harmony. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month <a href="http://rgable.typepad.com/aworks/2006/07/im_reading_new_.html">aworks</a> wrote something that has fascinated me ever since:</p>
<blockquote><p>I just have no interest in harmony. I can&#8217;t hear it, I don&#8217;t enjoy it when I recognize it, it&#8217;s boring to read about, etc. Timbre on the other hand&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>It had never occurred to me that one can enjoy music without enjoying harmony.  You might read that and think, &#8220;Goodness, how closed-minded!&#8221;  That&#8217;s a matter of opinion; to me it&#8217;s a perfectly valid point of view, although I don&#8217;t share it.  (I do agree that harmony is pretty boring to read about, but sometimes we just have to.)<span id="more-145"></span></p>
<p>If anything, my own closed-mindedness is exactly the opposite.  I rarely enjoy music where the emotional content is not driven by harmony; where it&#8217;s all about timbre and nothing else.  (Although, for some reason, I do quite like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Var%C3%A8se">Varèse</a>.)  My mind wanders during 12-tone music, and music that&#8217;s all about timbre and/or atmosphere, like that of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Crumb">George Crumb</a>, for example.  Harmony, not necessarily tonality, is the key to activating the listener&#8217;s <a href="http://rogerbourland.com/redblackwindow/2006/08/04/emotional-goose-bumps/">Emotional Goose Bumps</a>.</p>
<p>Not that I don&#8217;t appreciate timbre at all.  It&#8217;s a major component of lots of music that I like: Stravinsky&#8217;s <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=as2&#038;path=ASIN/B000002ZNH&#038;tag=aboutthecom07-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Les Noces</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=aboutthecom07-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000002ZNH" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; padding:0px; margin:0px !important;" /></em> is largely about timbre, as is most of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?link_code=ur2&#038;tag=aboutthecom07-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;location=/gp/search%3F%26index=classical%26keywords=Steve%20Reich%26_encoding=UTF8">Steve Reich&#8217;s</a> music, which I thoroughly enjoy.</p>
<p><b>Question:</b>  If you&#8217;re in the harmony-doesn&#8217;t-matter camp, would you be put off by accessible lyricism in a piece, despite any interesting timbral qualities?  I would truly like to know.</p>
<p>Back in the late Eighties, a fellow composition student and I became obsessed with a relatively recent work he had discovered.  <a href="http://www.schwantner.net/">Joseph Schwantner&#8217;s</a> <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=as2&#038;path=ASIN/B0001XAQY6&#038;tag=aboutthecom07-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Sparrows</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=aboutthecom07-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0001XAQY6" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; padding:0px; margin:0px !important;" /></em>, for soprano and chamber ensemble, combines all of your favorite late-20th-Century <em>shtick</em> with accessible, almost-cloying-but-not-quite lyricism.</p>
<p>Largely based on a pattern of fifths, the harmonic language is devised in a way so as to avoid predictability.  It&#8217;s a cycle using familiar diatonic-sounding harmonies, although it avoids triads and the harmonic progression never really resolves.  For example (I use the terms &#8220;minor&#8221; and &#8220;major&#8221; very loosely here): B-flat minor &#8211; down to G-flat major &#8211; down to F minor &#8211; down to D-flat major down to C-minor, etc.  In other words, down a major third, down a minor second&#8230; resolution never occurs.  But it&#8217;s beautiful to hear.</p>
<p>(Oops.  Sorry&#8230;. just made you read about harmony.)</p>
<p>This harmonic idea is combined with some aleatory, humming string players, bowed vibes, etc., making for a richly interesting sound experience.</p>
<p>Have a listen:<br />
<p><a href="http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/audio/sparrows1.mp3">Download audio file ()</a></p></p>
<p>&#8220;Sparrows&#8221; is a well-rounded work too: there&#8217;s a &#8220;B&#8221; section to, which contrasts the material I&#8217;ve just described beautifully.  It&#8217;s not as immediately accessible; quite dark and angular in fact.</p>
<p><p><a href="http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/audio/sparrows2.mp3">Download audio file ()</a></p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/something-for-everyone-in-sparrows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/audio/sparrows2.mp3" length="731916" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/audio/sparrows1.mp3" length="1183788" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

