<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging Student Composers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/judging-student-composers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/judging-student-composers/</link>
	<description>Composer and Teacher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Rockwell</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/judging-student-composers/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Rockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/blog/archives/256#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I would add one other important criteria to this list: Does the piece demonstrate good &quot;chorustration&quot; (i.e., choral composition technique)?  A lot of composers write music that fulfills all of the criterion that you listed extremely well, but the music betrays a lack of awareness of how choruses make sound, how they tune internally, how the different vocal parts function throughout their different ranges, and whether the relative difficulty presented by passages is worth the musical effect and appropriate for the intended ensemble.  Many composers apparently reduce the many technical considerations down to merely giving starting pitches.  In previous generations/centuries, practically all composers had direct, extensive experience with how choral music works.  Sadly, that is no longer true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would add one other important criteria to this list: Does the piece demonstrate good &#8220;chorustration&#8221; (i.e., choral composition technique)?  A lot of composers write music that fulfills all of the criterion that you listed extremely well, but the music betrays a lack of awareness of how choruses make sound, how they tune internally, how the different vocal parts function throughout their different ranges, and whether the relative difficulty presented by passages is worth the musical effect and appropriate for the intended ensemble.  Many composers apparently reduce the many technical considerations down to merely giving starting pitches.  In previous generations/centuries, practically all composers had direct, extensive experience with how choral music works.  Sadly, that is no longer true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelkaulkin.com/judging-student-composers/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutthecomposer.com/blog/archives/256#comment-209</guid>
		<description>This is a very thorough review.... well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very thorough review&#8230;. well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

